Friday, 19 March 2021

'THE LEGACY': 8: J.B. VERSUS K.B.: JIWATRAM BHAGWANDAS KRIPLANI AND KRISHNA BALLABH SAHAY (19/03/2021)

JIWATRAM BHAGWANDAS KRIPLANI
(11NOVEMBER 1888-19 MARCH 1982)

KRISHNA BALLABH SAHAY
(31 DECEMBER 1898-3 JUNE 1974)

  
 

After he took over as the Revenue Minister in the Sri Krishna Sinha’s Ministry in 1946, Zamindari Abolition became the top priority of Krishna Ballabh Sahay. This alarmed his adversaries who began conspiring against him. K. B. Sahay was aware of the developments but he was steady in his resolve. Raja Kamakhya Narayan Singh of Ramgarh and Sir Kameshwar Singh, Maharajadhiraja of Darbhanga was the chief architect of the ploy against K. B. Sahay. Raja Kamakhya Narayan Singh got a few Congressmen to write to the central leadership forwarding therewith a bunch of 22 complaints against K. B. Sahay. Among the local Congressmen were ex District Congress Chief Ram Narayan Singh, Mohammad Saleh and President of Hazaribagh District Mahila Khadi Kendra Saraswati Devi. These Congressmen belonged to the ‘Old Guards’ who believed that the younger crop of leaders like K. B. Sahay has steered the independence movement in a direction that was totally different from what they had been practising over the years. In fact, after the advent of Mahatma Gandhi, Congress as a party had moved ahead from the phase of laidback ‘drawing-room discussion’ to the phase of constructive changes by involving the common man to the cause of the freedom struggle. Leaders like K. B. Sahay were quite successful in making Congress a potent force in the countryside by dint of his hard labour and organizational capabilities and therefore the ‘old guards’ feared getting completely overshadowed by him. Though he was brought up in Hazaribagh, they considered K. B. Sahay an outsider as Hazaribagh was not his birth-place. Hence they targeted K. B. Sahay with a horde of allegations, some of which were trivial and without any substance. In their complaint, these Congressmen alleged that K. B. Sahay had stopped Dr Rajendra Prasad from visiting the Khadi Kendra run by Saraswati Devi, that K. B. Sahay supplements the income of fellow Congress workers by sharing his salary as Revenue Minister with them ( K. B. Sahay had kept Dr Rajendra Prasad informed of this), that K. B. Sahay was close to many industrialists, that as Minister of Forests, K. B. Sahay had imposed a restriction on free access to forest property, that noted advocate Bajrang Sahay was hired by the Bihar Government at the instance of K.B. Sahay to help him draft the Zamindari Abolition Bill, and so on and so forth. In their concluding remarks, these Congressmen called for disciplinary action against K. B. Sahay. 


This complaint letter was received by J. B. Kriplani, who had just taken over from Maulana Abul Kalam Azad as the President of All India Congress Committee. Kriplani promptly forwarded this letter to K. B. Sahay seeking his comments on the issues raised.


In his reply dated 2nd July 1946, K. B. Sahay gave a point-wise reply to each of these allegations. He informed Kriplani that ‘Dr Rajendra Prasad is well aware of her (Smt. Saraswati Devi) once having made allegations against me and of my having pressed then for an enquiry into the allegations and a reference may be made to him (Dr Rajendra Prasad) as to why the allegations were not enquired into.’ K. B. Sahay further added that he ‘introduced the Forest Act …as an attempt to preserve the forests. I am sure that intelligent sections of people do appreciate my effort to preserve the forests of Chhotanagpur and posterity will do so in future. With regard to the nativity issue, K. B. Sahay considered the charge to be frivolous but nevertheless clarified that ‘though born in Patna I was brought up in Hazaribagh from my childhood and have been working in the district of Hazaribagh for the last 27 years. It is true that I am now a Minister but what prospect was there before me when I courted imprisonment in 1930, 1932, 1933, and 1934 or even in 1940 and 1942 from Hazaribagh district? 


K. B. Sahay further clarified that ‘I appointed Babu Bajrang Sahay as Government pleader during 1937 Ministry. But the appointment was not made against Rule, which does not require a minimum practice of ten years. He was appointed to draft Zamindari Abolition Bill with the full consent of the Ministers in a meeting.’


With regard to the charge of providing financial support to poor Congress workers, K. B. Sahay informed that ‘Before I became Minister I used to raise subscriptions for these workers which were regularly entered in the District Congress Committee accounts and after I became a Minister I have been paying Rs 300/- per month from my salary for the maintenance of some of the workers. I don’t think I have sinned in this respect. ….Babu Ram Narayan Singh’s allegation besides being unjust to me is cruel to the workers who on a small allowance of Rs 50/- or so continue to toil for Congress. I often get money from the capitalists to pay some Congress workers or help some organization…. and all such fund is deposited in the public account of the District Congress Committee.’


K. B. Sahay concluded his reply in the following words ‘I am sorry I have troubled you with this long letter. I could not help it because every specific charge had to be answered. But I welcome the demand of Babu Ram Narayan Singh that the allegations ought to be enquired into. I would suggest that you might depute a member of the All India Congress Working Committee to look into these allegations. The condition of the enquiry must however be that if these allegations are found to be false and malicious Babu Ram Narayan Singh must be turned out of the Congress having tried to lower the prestige of a Congressman who is at present a Minister. It goes without saying that if I am found guilty of moral turpitude I shall not hesitate for two minutes to walk out of Congress and the Ministry. I am sending a copy of this letter to Dr Rajendra Prasad and Mahatma Gandhi. I am also returning the papers containing the allegations’.


This terse reply from K. B. Sahay had the desired impact on J. B. Kriplani, who did not further pursue the matter. He had got a taste of the mettle K. B. Sahay was made of. The reply gives an insight into the manner K. B. Sahay raised Congress from the scratch in Chhotanagpur and made it a potent political force in Chhotanagpur. He was quite candid in accepting that he received donations for furthering the cause of Congress and for helping poor fellow Congress worker. He could do so because his conscience was clear. He kept a detailed account of every donation received and also of every penny spent out of the District Congress Fund. There are scores of correspondences between K. B. Sahay and Dr Rajendra Prasad where he sought Dr Prasad’s permission to draw money from the District Congress Fund for any political purpose. Such conscientiousness is a rarity in present-day leadership.   

No comments:

Post a Comment